Dear Lisa,
Obviously, I should’ve finished that damn memoir. All the people who told me that I was too young, didn’t have anything to say yet, and should focus instead on writing essays about my cat or the time I hiked through the redwood forest were, in fact, full of shit. Because the book I’m reviewing for the (homeless) newspaper is my book, written by someone else, but still, the characters, the voice, the setting… it’s exactly like the book I was writing when I started to believe my professors knew more than me.
Why did I ever start believing that? I think it has something to do with workshops. You sit around week after week, month after month, semester after agonizing semester, while everyone and their dog tears your work to pieces and you wonder why you were even admitted into the damn writing program in the first place if you can’t actually write. And then, like any good re-education, the professor comes to you at the end of it all with what seems like a good answer to the question of “well, what the hell am I gonna do now?!” They have the secret to getting published, damn it. They’ve been in Oprah magazine. They know exactly what you need to do.
So they take the charred remnants of your confidence as a writer and attempt to rebuild you.
In short, I’m Frankenstein over here, without a single original thought in my head. Thanks formerly-published-author-turned-professor-who-can’t-get-a-book-deal-to-save-their-life! Now we both suck!
I kinda have to give Stephanie K. credit. While her book sucks (and it does, it really really really really does) she managed to write it, and she didn’t listen to all the bullshit telling her to actually get better at writing first. Stephanie K., you are my inspiration. No joke. You told the story of my adolescence — albeit badly, and as a work of fiction — and you actually got MTV press to publish the damn thing.
(Yes, the MTV conglomerate has a publishing arm. And yes, their taste in books sucks about as much as their taste in music.)
So while her book is bad and mine was actually cool (because mine was true… and my dialogue didn’t sound like fourth-graders on acid… and I didn’t make our tiny midwestern town sound like its punk scene was cooler than Chicago, which, Stephanie, lets get real here and admit that it wasn’t… and by the way, no one grabs for a beer while they’re having sex, especially for the first time, even if it’s the worst sex of their life…) I applaud her for writing the thing and getting it published. She’s a better writer than me in that regard, for sure.
So, I really have only one question… When I’m reviewing a book I could’ve written (should’ve written), and it is so terrible that it causes me physical pain, do I actually have to finish it? Giving old Stephanie the benefit of the doubt, it might actually get better. But in the meantime, in between time, as I desperately hope for the writing to improve, as the story gets more and more unbelievable, how do I survive it?
Plus, if I ever want to finish my memoir (and I do… those bastards haven’t gotten me down yet) how will I separate her fiction from my fact? Drug-addled memories are hazy at best, and vulnerable to even the smallest suggested editing. I feel like I need to protect my true world from her crappy pretend one.
Any ideas? Besides burning the book, taking a photo of me burning it, and then sending that in as my review, with the title “Bitch Steals Book From My Head”? So, besides the obvious?
Jessica
PS I think describing her dialogue as “fourth graders on acid” actually makes it sound better than it is. Maybe it’s more like ninth-graders pretending their on acid. Which is, rightfully, a completely different image.